The most abundant biological material on Earth might just hold the key to a cleaner, greener energy future.
Publications
Inventions
Startups
Imagine a future where jets fly, ships sail, and vehicles run not on fossil fuels, but on clean, renewable energy derived from non-food plants like switchgrass and poplar trees.
This is not science fiction; it is the ambitious goal driving the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Bioenergy Research Centers (BRCs).
The program was born from a groundbreaking "Billion Ton Study," which assessed that the United States could potentially produce over a billion tons of sustainable biomass annually—enough to displace a significant portion of the nation's petroleum consumption1 . To turn this potential into reality, the DOE established a network of BRCs, leveraging the latest advances in genomics, microbial biology, and chemical engineering to tackle one of the biggest challenges in the biofuel industry: efficiently unlocking the energy stored within the tough, complex structure of plant cell walls1 3 . For over 15 years, these centers have been conducting the basic science that will finally break down the barriers to a domestic bioenergy industry7 .
The primary obstacle to creating cost-effective plant-based biofuels is lignocellulosic biomass recalcitrance1 . Lignocellulose, the main component of plant cell walls, is the most abundant biological material on Earth3 .
Long chains of glucose that can be converted into biofuels.
A complex polymer of various sugars.
This recalcitrance is why a fallen tree takes years to decompose in a forest. For an efficient biofuel industry, scientists needed to find a way to rapidly and cheaply break down this natural fortress.
The DOE's solution was to fund multidisciplinary research centers, each tackling the bioenergy challenge from a slightly different angle. The program began in 2007 with three centers and was expanded to four in 2017 following a decade of successful research7 .
| Center & Leadership | Primary Research & Development Strategies |
|---|---|
| CABBI University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
"Plants as factories" for biofuels/bio-products; AI-driven biofoundries; sustainable bioeconomy analysis3 . |
| CBI Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
Domesticating bioenergy crops & microbes; co-product development; "drop-in" biofuels like sustainable aviation fuel3 . |
| GLBRC University of Wisconsin–Madison & Michigan State University |
Sustainable cropping systems; novel biomass deconstruction methods; engineering conversion microbes3 . |
| JBEI Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
Engineering bioenergy crops; affordable deconstruction tech (e.g., ionic liquids); high-throughput biosystem design for biofuels3 . |
This collaborative yet diverse approach ensures that the BRC program explores multiple pathways to success simultaneously, accelerating the pace of discovery.
The collective output of the BRCs has been staggering. During the initial 10-year period (2007-2017) alone, the three original centers produced a wealth of knowledge and innovation:
Peer-reviewed publications
Invention disclosures
Licenses or options
Company startups
BRC scientists have identified genes that control cell wall recalcitrance. By manipulating these genes, they have created bioenergy feedstocks that are easier to deconstruct without sacrificing field resilience1 .
Researchers have discovered and designed new, more efficient enzymes and microbes from diverse environments like compost piles and insect guts to break down biomass at a fraction of the cost.
A major focus has been engineering microbes that can not only break down biomass but also directly convert the resulting sugars into advanced "drop-in" biofuels that can directly replace gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel1 .
One of the most ambitious and transformative strategies pursued by the BRCs is Consolidated Bioprocessing (CBP), a "game-changing, one-step strategy"1 .
Traditional biofuel production requires multiple, expensive steps: biomass pretreatment, adding manufactured enzymes for deconstruction, and then using a second microbe to ferment the sugars into fuel. CBP aims to combine deconstruction and fermentation into a single step using one "multitalented" microbe or a designed microbial consortium.
No known natural microbe can both efficiently break down raw plant biomass and produce high yields of advanced biofuels.
Scientists at the Bioenergy Science Center (BESC) and other centers used a genome-enabled, synthetic biology approach.
Step 1: Gene Identification. Researchers identified key genes and enzyme targets in biomass-degrading microbes, such as those from the digestive systems of herbivores or from hot springs1 .
Step 2: Pathway Engineering. They then designed and inserted these genetic "instructions" for producing biomass-degrading enzymes into a robust, fermentative microbe, such as E. coli or Clostridium.
Step 3: Optimization & Testing. The engineered CBP microbe was cultivated in a bioreactor containing pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass like corn stover or switchgrass. Researchers then analyzed its ability to both deconstruct the biomass and produce the target biofuel.
Experiments demonstrated that engineered CBP microbes could successfully produce advanced biofuels directly from biomass. While natural breakdown can take weeks or months, the engineered processes compressed this timeline to a matter of days.
The analysis showed that CBP has the potential to dramatically lower production costs by eliminating the need to produce and purchase expensive external enzymes1 . This one-step process represents a more streamlined and potentially scalable path to an industrial biofuel process, moving the technology closer to commercial viability.
| Engineered CBP Strain | Feedstock | Time to Maximum Fuel Production (hours) | Biofuel Titer (grams per liter) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strain A (Parent) | Glucose | 48 | 0.5 |
| Strain B (Engineered) | Pretreated Switchgrass | 72 | 3.8 |
| Strain C (Optimized) | Pretreated Switchgrass | 60 | 5.2 |
Table 1 illustrates how successive generations of engineered microbes improve in both the speed and efficiency of biofuel production from raw, non-food biomass.
| Process Cost Component | Traditional Multi-Step Process | Consolidated Bioprocessing (CBP) | Potential Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzyme Production & Procurement | High | Negligible | >80% |
| Capital Equipment (Bioreactors) | Multiple Units Required | Single Unit Required | ~40% |
| Process Energy & Water Usage | High | Lower | ~30% |
Table 3 provides a techno-economic perspective, showing how innovative biological strategies like CBP can significantly reduce the overall cost of biofuel production, a critical factor for market adoption1 .
Novel solvents that affordably dissolve and pre-treat biomass, making sugars more accessible3 .
A high-throughput platform technology that rapidly screens enzyme and microbial activities on lignocellulosic substrates1 .
Gene-editing technology used to precisely modify the DNA of plants (to reduce recalcitrance) and microbes (to enhance fuel production).
Integrated study of genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to understand and redesign entire biological systems in microbes and plants4 .
In March 2023, the DOE demonstrated its continued commitment to this vision by announcing $590 million in funding to renew the four BRCs7 . This massive investment will allow the centers to build upon their legacy of success and continue driving innovation.
The work of the BRCs is about more than just scientific curiosity; it is a multi-faceted mission to strengthen America's energy security, create new economic opportunities in rural areas, and provide a powerful tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the hard-to-electrify transportation sector7 .
By harnessing the power of biology, the DOE Bioenergy Research Centers are turning the once-fanciful dream of plant-powered transportation into an attainable, and sustainable, reality.
Renewed funding announced in March 2023 to continue advancing bioenergy research7 .