How Europe and Sweden Are Betting on Solar Energy
In the global race toward a sustainable future, the humble solar panel has become more than just a source of power—it is a symbol of economic ingenuity and ecological responsibility.
Imagine powering your home with sunlight, and being paid for the excess electricity you feed back to the grid. This is the simple yet revolutionary idea behind feed-in tariffs (FiTs), a policy mechanism that supercharged Europe's solar energy landscape.
For decades, European nations have been experimenting with financial incentives to accelerate the transition to renewable energy, with solar photovoltaics (PV) at the forefront. This article explores how these incentives, particularly FiTs, reshaped Europe's energy mix and examines the unique path of Sweden—a country often associated with long, dark winters—as it emerges as an unexpected solar contender.
The journey from Germany's sun-drenched fields to Sweden's snow-covered rooftops reveals a fascinating story of policy, innovation, and the relentless pursuit of a fossil-free future.
A payment for every unit of electricity produced by the system, whether you use it in your own home or export it.
An additional payment for any surplus electricity you feed into the national grid.
The UK's FiT scheme, which ran from 2010 to 2019, offers a powerful case study. At its launch in 2010, the generation tariff was a generous 40-50p per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for solar, while the export tariff was around 3p/kWh 1 .
Source: Based on data from 1
This financial incentive was transformative. A household with a typical system installing solar panels in 2011 could have expected to earn over £41,000 across the 25-year contract, dramatically shortening the payback period and triggering a solar installation boom 1 .
As the cost of solar panels plummeted globally—falling 81% between 2010 and 2019—the need for high, subsidized tariffs diminished 1 . Many European countries have since moved to competitive, market-based mechanisms.
The UK replaced its FiT in 2019 with the Smart Export Guarantee (SEG), which requires suppliers to pay for exported electricity at a competitive market rate 1 .
Germany, a pioneer of FiTs, has also transitioned. As of 2025, it employs a system of regularly adjusted, degressing tariffs, with rates for small rooftop systems currently around €0.0786/kWh for partial feed-in and €0.1247/kWh for full feed-in 4 .
This evolution from fixed subsidies to market-based compensation marks the maturation of the European solar industry.
Sweden presents a fascinating paradox. A country with a climate not traditionally associated with solar power is now experiencing remarkable growth. How is this possible? The answer lies not in endless sunny days, but in a combination of targeted policies and a strong societal drive for sustainability.
Unlike countries that relied on classic feed-in tariffs, Sweden took a different path. Its primary support system for renewables was a technology-neutral, market-based electricity certificate system shared with Norway 8 . However, for small-scale solar producers, Sweden introduced a unique incentive: a tax credit 8 .
Since 2015, owners of small PV systems (with a main fuse ≤100 A) have been eligible for a premium of 0.6 SEK per kWh of electricity fed into the grid 8 . This scheme is set to expire at the end of 2025 8 .
The market is evolving rapidly, with a notable trend: batteries are shifting from being an add-on to solar investments to being the primary motivator for the investment itself 2 . This highlights a growing focus on energy independence and grid stability.
| Policy Mechanism | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity Certificate System | A market-based, technology-neutral support system for renewable electricity production. | Closed to new applicants since 2021, having met its 2030 target early 8 . |
| Tax Credit (Feed-in Premium) | A premium of 0.6 SEK/kWh paid as a tax credit for electricity fed into the grid by small systems. | Set to expire on 1 January 2026 8 . |
| Green Technology Deduction | A tax deduction for the installation of green technology, including solar panels and batteries. | 20% deduction for PV (lowering to 15% from July 2025); 50% for batteries 8 . |
| Energy Tax Exemption | Exemption from energy tax on self-consumed electricity from small PV systems. | Active for systems under 500 kWp 8 . |
To truly understand what drives solar adoption, we must look beyond broad policies and examine how different investors respond. A crucial study analyzing all applications to a Swedish capital subsidy program for PV between 2009 and 2021 provides this exact insight 7 .
The research aimed to analyze the relationship between policy incentives and the willingness to invest in PV systems across different investor groups: households, private companies, associations, and public organizations 7 . The researchers used a comprehensive dataset from the Swedish subsidy program, tracking application and investment decisions over a 12-year period. By correlating these decisions with the level of subsidy available at the time and other economic variables, they could measure the policy's direct impact.
The findings were clear and significant. The study concluded that subsidy levels had a notable positive impact on households and private companies 7 . When financial incentives were higher, these groups were more likely to invest. However, the response was not uniform.
| Investor Group | Key Influencing Factor | Policy Response |
|---|---|---|
| Households | Subsidy level | High sensitivity; direct financial incentives are a primary driver. |
| Private Companies | Subsidy level and interest rates | Sensitive to subsidies, but also heavily influenced by broader economic conditions and cost of capital. |
| Associations & Public Organizations | (Implied) Other non-financial factors | May require different incentives, such as reputational benefits or mandate-driven sustainability goals. |
Based on research findings from 7
Crafting a successful solar energy strategy requires more than just setting a price for solar power. It involves a suite of policy tools and considerations, as evidenced by the European and Swedish experience.
| Policy Tool | Function | European Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed Feed-in Tariff (FiT) | Guarantees a fixed, premium price for generated electricity to de-risk investment and spur rapid deployment. | The UK's initial 2010 scheme, with rates as high as 46.81p/kWh for generation 1 . |
| Degression Mechanism | Automatically reduces tariff rates over time to reflect and encourage falling technology costs, preventing over-subsidization. | Germany's Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) mandates a semiannual degression, e.g., 1% as of 2025 4 . |
| Market-Based Mechanisms (SEG, Premiums) | Integrates renewable energy into the electricity market, having suppliers compete to offer export rates. | The UK's Smart Export Guarantee (SEG) and Sweden's tax credit feed-in premium 1 8 . |
| Capital Subsidies & Tax Incentives | Lowers the prohibitive upfront cost of installation, making solar accessible to a wider range of consumers. | Sweden's Green Technology Deduction, offering a tax break on installation costs 8 . |
| Clear Regulatory Framework & Targets | Provides long-term certainty and signals a government's commitment, which is crucial for attracting large-scale investments. | Sweden's national goal of 100% fossil-free electricity production by 2040 8 . |
European solar policy has evolved from fixed subsidies to market-based mechanisms as technology costs have decreased and markets have matured.
Research shows that different investor groups respond differently to incentives, highlighting the need for tailored policy approaches.
The European journey with feed-in tariffs and solar subsidies offers a powerful blueprint for the world. These policies proved that with the right financial incentives, it is possible to catalyze a technological revolution, drive down costs through economies of scale, and put a dent in carbon emissions. The story continues to evolve, moving from rigid subsidies to flexible, market-integrated systems.
For Sweden, the future is not just about adding more solar panels. The focus is shifting toward integration and flexibility. The rising popularity of home batteries and large-scale storage solutions is a testament to this, helping to manage the intermittent nature of solar power and mitigate grid congestion 2 8 .
Furthermore, with the electricity certificate system closed and the tax credit scheme expiring soon, Sweden stands at a policy crossroads. The nation's experience, coupled with research showing the need for tailored policies, will be invaluable in designing the next generation of support mechanisms.
References will be added here manually.