Exploring the future of biofuels at the crucial crossroads of renewable energy
Explore the ScienceImagine powering airplanes, ships, and trucks without relying solely on fossil fuels. This isn't science fiction—it's the promise of next-generation biofuels.
The answer lies at the intersection of cutting-edge science, global policy, and market realities. Join us as we separate hope from hype and explore what's truly next for biofuels in our energy landscape.
Reducing carbon emissions with renewable alternatives
Cutting-edge research driving biofuel advancements
Biofuels in the context of worldwide energy transition
Biofuels aren't new—we've been producing ethanol from corn and sugarcane, and biodiesel from vegetable oils for decades. What's changing is where and why they're being produced.
According to the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook, global biofuel use is expected to grow by just 0.9% annually over the next decade, significantly slower than in the past 1 . This slowdown isn't uniform across all countries—it reflects a dramatic geographic shift in production and consumption.
High-income countries are experiencing stagnating fuel demand due to electric vehicle adoption and changing policies. Meanwhile, middle-income countries are driving what growth remains.
Projected growth in global biofuel production (2024-2034)
| Biofuel Type | 2024 Production Level | Projected 2034 Production | Primary Feedstocks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol | ~140 billion liters | 155 billion liters | Maize (60%), sugarcane (22%), molasses (6%), wheat (2%) |
| Biomass-based Diesel | ~70 billion liters | 80.9 billion liters | Vegetable oils (70%), used cooking oils & tallow (24%) |
Source: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 1
Biofuels live and die by policy decisions. In the United States, the Renewable Fuel Standard mandates specific volumes of renewable fuels, while the Inflation Reduction Act provides additional incentives 1 . However, uncertainty looms—the biodiesel tax credit expiration has created significant market uncertainty for 2025 5 .
The European Union has taken a different approach with its Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), which includes stricter sustainability criteria and limits on feedstocks that compete with food production 1 . These policies are increasingly shaping not just how much biofuel gets produced, but what kind—with profound implications for which technologies succeed.
The "food versus fuel" debate has long shadowed the biofuel industry, but scientists are developing sophisticated solutions that may finally resolve this conflict.
Utilize food crops like corn, sugarcane, and vegetable oils
Derive from non-food sources like agricultural residues, wood chips, and dedicated energy crops
Utilize algae and other microorganisms
Combine genetically optimized feedstocks with carbon capture technologies
The exciting development is that we're rapidly moving beyond first-generation approaches. As IDTechEx notes, "Second-generation biofuels, derived from lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural residues, and non-food crops, are gaining attention for their greater sustainability and reduced competition with food resources" 6 .
Perhaps the most promising application for advanced biofuels is in aviation. While electric vehicles may dominate personal transportation, the energy density requirements for air travel make biofuels one of the few viable decarbonization options. Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80% compared to conventional jet fuel 6 .
The production of SAF is poised for dramatic growth. IDTechEx forecasts that "global renewable diesel and SAF production capacity is forecast to exceed 57 million tonnes annually by 2035, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5%" 6 . Major airlines are already conducting test flights and signing long-term purchase agreements, signaling strong market confidence.
| Production Pathway | Feedstock | Technology Readiness | Advantages | Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEFA (Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids) | Vegetable oils, waste fats | Commercial (Established) | Drop-in fuel, existing infrastructure | Feedstock availability, cost |
| FT (Fischer-Tropsch) Synthesis | Agricultural residues, municipal solid waste | Demonstration & Early Commercial | Utilizes waste streams | High capital costs, complex operations |
| Alcohol-to-Jet (ATJ) | Ethanol, biomass-derived alcohols | Demonstration | Can leverage existing ethanol production | Multiple processing steps |
| Power-to-Liquids (E-fuels) | CO₂ + green hydrogen | Early Development | Potentially carbon-neutral | Very high energy requirements, cost |
While many biofuel breakthroughs happen in laboratory settings, some of the most compelling evidence comes from real-world testing. Phase II of a University of Nebraska-Lincoln study evaluating E30 fuel (a blend of 30% ethanol and 70% gasoline) in conventional state vehicles provides a perfect case study 4 .
The researchers took an approach that balances scientific rigor with practical relevance:
| Metric | Observation | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle Performance | No observable negative effects | Challenges myths about higher ethanol blends damaging engines |
| Mileage Accumulated | Hundreds of thousands of miles | Provides substantial real-world data across diverse driving conditions |
| Vehicle Types | 94 state vehicles of various makes/models | Demonstrates broad compatibility versus limited applicability |
| Maintenance Issues | None attributed to E30 fuel | Addresses durability concerns raised by skeptics |
Contrary to common concerns about higher ethanol blends, the preliminary results have been striking. As of mid-2025, the fleet had "logged hundreds of thousands of miles on E30 with no observable negative effects" 4 .
This finding is significant for several reasons. First, it challenges the automotive industry's conservative approach to ethanol blending. Second, it demonstrates that higher ethanol blends can be integrated into existing vehicle fleets without expensive modifications—an important consideration for rapid adoption. Third, it provides real-world validation of laboratory studies showing similar results.
The biofuel revolution isn't just happening in fields and factories—it's occurring in sophisticated laboratories where scientists are reengineering biological systems. At Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, researchers are deploying an impressive arsenal of tools:
Modifying microorganisms to efficiently convert plant waste into liquid transportation fuels 2
"A type of simulation that analyzes the financial and environmental outcomes of biomanufacturing processes" 2 —crucial for determining which approaches make both scientific and economic sense
Using bio-based processes to improve the performance of traditional fuels, creating a bridge between existing infrastructure and future solutions 2
One of the most exciting frontiers is the development of dedicated energy crops. At the Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), bioscientist Anne Villacastin is using genetic tools to "supercharge the growing power of sorghum, a cereal plant that humans have been cultivating for millennia" 2 .
By adding genes from wheat, researchers are creating sorghum strains that grow tall and robust with minimal water, potentially offering farmers a profitable crop that doubles as biofuel feedstock.
Meanwhile, synthetic biology companies are partnering with research institutions to sequence and engineer promising biofuel crops like Jatropha curcas, which produces oil-rich seeds but has historically suffered from low yields 7 . Through careful genetic analysis and breeding, scientists are identifying traits that could make such dedicated energy crops economically viable.
Despite exciting advances, significant challenges remain:
While "drop-in" biofuels that work with existing engines and pipelines offer a major advantage, scaling production to meaningful levels requires substantial capital investment. As IDTechEx notes, commercial uptake of advanced production technologies beyond HEFA "is expected to remain limited through 2035" 6 .
Nevertheless, the trajectory is promising. The global biofuels market is projected to grow from $268.57 billion in 2025 to $497.29 billion by 2032, representing a compound annual growth rate of 9.20% 8 .
This growth will be increasingly driven by sectors that are difficult to electrify, such as aviation and shipping.
The circular economy approach—turning waste into fuel—also represents a powerful trend. Companies like LanzaTech are already operating commercial plants that "convert waste carbon emissions into ethanol, preventing them from polluting the environment" 8 . Such innovations align biofuels with broader sustainability goals beyond just carbon reduction.
As we've seen, the future of biofuels lies between unbridled hope and dismissive hype.
The transition from first-generation to advanced biofuels is underway, though not as quickly as optimists might wish. The most promising applications appear to be in sectors like aviation and shipping, where electrification faces significant challenges.
The science is solid, the technologies are developing, and the market is growing—but success will require smart policies, continued innovation, and realistic expectations. As we move forward, biofuels seem less like a silver bullet and more like an important piece of our diversified energy puzzle—not pure hope, not mere hype, but a credible contributor to our sustainable energy future.
The next decade will be decisive. With continued research, strategic investment, and evidence-based policies, we may well look back at this period as the moment when biofuels evolved from a simple alternative into a sophisticated solution.