BECCS in the Upper Missouri River Basin

Harvesting Carbon-Negative Energy from Heartland Resources

Explore the Technology

The River Basin's Secret Climate Weapon

Imagine a power plant that actually removes more greenhouse gases from the atmosphere than it releases—a facility that generates electricity while steadily cleansing the air of carbon dioxide.

This isn't science fiction; it's the promise of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), a technology that could transform the Upper Missouri River Basin into a carbon-negative powerhouse. As this region spanning parts of Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska faces climate challenges affecting its iconic river system, BECCS offers a surprising solution that turns agricultural residues, energy crops, and forest waste into tools for atmospheric restoration.

The concept is as elegant as it is powerful: plants naturally absorb CO₂ as they grow, then we capture the carbon dioxide released when using this biomass for energy, preventing it from returning to the atmosphere.

The result? Net-negative emissions that actively reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases warming our planet . For the Upper Missouri River Basin, with its abundant agricultural lands and unique geological formations, this technology represents more than just clean energy—it's an opportunity to pioneer a climate solution that could simultaneously boost rural economies and create a more sustainable future.

Carbon Negative

Removes more CO₂ than it emits

Uses Biomass

Agricultural and forestry residues

Geological Storage

Permanent underground sequestration

What Exactly is BECCS?

At its core, Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) combines two well-established processes: bioenergy production and carbon capture technology. The genius lies in how these elements work together to create a system with negative emissions.

Key Insight

BECCS creates a one-way carbon flow: carbon moves from the atmosphere into plants, then into our energy system, and finally deep into the earth where it can no longer contribute to climate change.

The BECCS Process

1
Biomass Growth

Plants absorb CO₂ from the atmosphere through photosynthesis as they grow, acting as natural carbon sinks.

2
Energy Production

Biomass is converted into energy (electricity, heat, or biofuels) through combustion, fermentation, or gasification.

3
Carbon Capture

CO₂ released during energy conversion is captured using specialized technologies before it can enter the atmosphere.

4
Transport & Storage

Captured CO₂ is compressed, transported, and injected deep underground into secure geological formations for permanent storage.

IPCC Recognition

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified this carbon removal technology as potentially critical in mitigation pathways compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C 1 .

Global Potential

Estimates suggest BECCS could remove between 0.5 and 22 gigatons of CO₂ annually by 2050—a significant portion of our current global emissions 1 .

The Technology Behind the Magic: Capturing Carbon in Action

Carbon capture technology forms the engineering backbone of BECCS, and researchers have developed three primary methods to intercept CO₂ before it escapes to the atmosphere.

Post-combustion

This approach separates CO₂ from the other gases in the flue gas stream AFTER biomass has been burned.

Key Advantage: It can be retrofitted to existing power plants, making it a practical solution for near-term implementation.

Modern post-combustion systems can capture approximately 95% of the CO₂ emissions .

Pre-combustion

This method captures carbon BEFORE burning the fuel. Biomass first undergoes gasification.

Key Advantage: Produces clean hydrogen as a byproduct, which can be used as a carbon-free fuel.

This process converts biomass to syngas, then captures CO₂ before combustion .

Oxy-fuel Combustion

In this process, biomass is burned in a mixture of oxygen and recycled flue gas instead of ordinary air.

Key Advantage: Eliminates nitrogen from flue gas, resulting in a nearly pure stream of CO₂.

The water vapor is easily removed by condensation, leaving high-purity CO₂ ready for storage .

Technology Comparison

Technology Capture Point Key Advantage Efficiency
Post-combustion After burning Retrofits existing plants ~95%
Pre-combustion Before burning Produces clean hydrogen ~85%
Oxy-fuel During burning High-purity CO₂ stream ~87.5%

Inside a Groundbreaking Experiment: The Illinois Industrial CCS Project

While large-scale BECCS deployment in the Upper Missouri River Basin remains in the future, we can look to a pioneering project in the American heartland to understand how this technology works in practice.

The Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (IL-CCS) project in Decatur, Illinois, represents one of the world's first successful industrial-scale BECCS implementations .

Methodology Step-by-Step

Biomass Processing

The facility converts corn—grown on surrounding agricultural lands—into ethanol through fermentation. This process generates a nearly pure stream of CO₂ as a byproduct.

Carbon Capture

Instead of being released to the atmosphere, the CO₂ from fermentation is captured and compressed into a supercritical fluid—a dense state where it behaves like both a liquid and a gas.

Transportation

The compressed CO₂ is transported via pipeline to the injection site.

Geological Injection

Using specialized high-pressure pumps, the CO₂ is injected deep underground into the Mount Simon Sandstone, a saline formation located approximately 7,000 feet beneath the surface.

Monitoring and Verification

An extensive network of sensors tracks the injected CO₂ to ensure it remains securely contained within the storage formation .

Project Highlights
  • Location Decatur, IL
  • CO₂ Captured 1M+ tonnes
  • Storage Depth 7,000 ft
  • Leakage Detected None

Results and Significance

The IL-CCS project has achieved remarkable success. Between 2011 and 2014, the pilot phase safely captured and stored one million tonnes of CO₂ without any detected leakage from the injection zone. Building on this success, Phase 2 launched in 2017 with expanded capacity .

CO₂ Storage Verification
Project Timeline
Metric Pilot Phase Results Significance
CO₂ Injected 1 million tonnes Proves technical feasibility at scale
Monitoring Method Seismic, pressure, and chemical sensors Ensures storage integrity
Leakage Detected None Confirms geological security
Storage Formation Mount Simon Sandstone Validates saline formations as viable storage

The significance of these results cannot be overstated. They demonstrate that geological sequestration can securely contain CO₂ on meaningful timescales, addressing a major concern about carbon storage technologies.

Furthermore, the project has shown that BECCS can be successfully integrated into existing biofuel production facilities—a highly relevant finding for the Upper Missouri River Basin with its growing bioeconomy.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Resources for BECCS Research

Advancing BECCS technology requires specialized materials, monitoring equipment, and research tools. Here are the key components that scientists are using to develop and refine this carbon-negative technology.

Air Separation Unit

Produces high-purity oxygen essential for oxy-fuel combustion systems

Capture
Amine-based Solvents

Chemically binds with CO₂ to enable post-combustion capture from flue gases

Capture
Geological Seismic Sensors

Detect underground vibrations to monitor CO₂ movement in storage formations

Monitoring
Gasifiers

Convert solid biomass to syngas as a core component of pre-combustion systems

Conversion
Saline Formation Brine Samples

Simulate underground conditions to test CO₂-rock-water interactions

Storage
Life Cycle Assessment Software

Models environmental impacts to evaluate net carbon balance and sustainability

Analysis
Tool/Resource Primary Function Application in BECCS Research
Air Separation Unit Produces high-purity oxygen Essential for oxy-fuel combustion systems
Amine-based Solvents Chemically binds with CO₂ Enables post-combustion capture from flue gases
Geological Seismic Sensors Detect underground vibrations Monitors CO₂ movement in storage formations
Gasifiers Convert solid biomass to syngas Core component of pre-combustion systems
Saline Formation Brine Samples Simulate underground conditions Tests CO₂-rock-water interactions for storage security
Life Cycle Assessment Software Models environmental impacts Evaluates net carbon balance and sustainability

BECCS in the Upper Missouri River Basin: Unique Opportunities and Challenges

The Upper Missouri River Basin possesses distinctive characteristics that make it particularly suitable for BECCS deployment, while also presenting special considerations that must be addressed.

Opportunities

Biomass Resources

The region's extensive agricultural lands could provide substantial biomass resources without necessarily competing with food production.

Agricultural residues
Dedicated energy crops
Forestry residues
Municipal solid waste
Geological Advantages

The Upper Missouri River Basin sits above portions of the Williston Basin, which contains extensive porous rock formations overlain by impermeable caprocks—ideal geological conditions for CO₂ storage.

Carbon Intensity

Research indicates that using regional biomass resources strategically could generate carbon-negative electricity with a carbon intensity of -2,500 g CO₂e/kWh—far better than even solar or wind power which have positive (though low) carbon footprints 2 .

Challenges

Water Resource Impacts

Biomass cultivation requires water, which must be carefully managed in a region where water scarcity can already be an issue 1 .

High Water Demand
Land Use Competition

While energy crops can be grown on marginal lands, there are valid concerns about competition with food production or conservation areas if not properly managed 1 .

Moderate Land Impact
Economic Viability

Current cost estimates for BECCS range from $60-250 per ton of CO₂ captured, making significant cost reductions or policy support necessary for widespread deployment .

High Cost Barrier
Infrastructure Requirements

Developing the necessary capture equipment, pipelines, and injection wells represents a substantial investment.

Significant Infrastructure
BECCS Cost Comparison with Other Technologies

The Path Forward for the Basin

For the Upper Missouri River Basin, BECCS represents more than just a climate solution—it's an opportunity to transform the regional economy while addressing environmental challenges.

With its combination of extensive agricultural resources, suitable geology, and existing energy infrastructure, the basin could potentially become a national leader in carbon-negative energy.

Technological Innovation

Ongoing research focuses on improving the efficiency of carbon capture systems and developing biomass sources with lower water and fertilizer requirements 1 .

Policy Support

The future of BECCS will depend on supportive policies that recognize the value of carbon removal and thoughtful engagement with local communities.

Integrated Solutions

We may see integrated BECCS facilities that combine various approaches—using agricultural waste for power generation while producing biofuels for hard-to-electrify sectors.

If these elements align, this historic river system could become synonymous not just with America's natural heritage, but with its climate restoration future as well.

References